(The HighWire) It’s common knowledge that the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the deadly COVID-19 jabs would not have been possible if any alternative treatments for SARS-CoV-2 were available. With that in mind, the intentional war against repurposed drugs to treat COVID—specifically Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin (IVM)—will no doubt be unending and always deceptive. The latest such attack appears in a February 2024 Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy publication claiming that during the first wave of COVID-19, off-label use of HCQ resulted in an 11 percent increase in the mortality rate, resulting in 16,990 deaths in six countries. Cutting to the core of its objective—which is undoubtedly to ensure affordable drugs like HCQ aren’t used in future pandemics—the study declares:
“These findings illustrate the hazard of drug repurposing with low-level evidence for the management of future pandemics.”
The study, titled “Deaths induced by compassionate use of hydroxychloroquine during the first COVID-19 wave: an estimate,” cites a meta-analysis published in 2021 in Nature, which the study authors used to estimate the number of deaths they claim were caused by HCQ. The recent study reports that “the toxicity of HCQ in patients with COVID-19 is partially due to cardiac side effects,” as referenced in the 2020 RECOVERY trial titled “Effect of Hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.” Not surprisingly, that trial was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Oxford University, among others, all components of the same sinister group profiting from and incessantly promoting the contaminated gene-damaging mRNA jabs while discrediting existing affordable drugs and cautioning of future pandemics.
Maybe worth considering chloroquine for C19 https://t.co/LEYob7Jofr
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 16, 2020
Led by Jean-Christophe Lega, a Professor of Therapeutics in the Lyon, France hospital system, the study analyzed research conducted in France, the United States, Belgium, Italy, Spain, and Turkey from March 2020 until July 2020. The authors note their main objective was to estimate the mortality attributed to “compassionate use of HCQ in the context of COVID-19 before the publication of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).” Chock full of the word “estimate,” two of the more eye-opening times the flexible word is used in the researchers’ analysis should make even those who condemn the mRNA-resistors suspicious of the study’s accuracy. Making a mockery of what should absolutely be reliable data, the authors reveal the bogus qualities of the study—which, again, come from the 2021 RECOVERY study funded by Gates, Wellcome, and the other deep state cohorts—stating:
“HCQ-related deaths may be considerably over- or under-estimated. Indeed, the 95% confidence interval of the OR (odds ratio) of all-cause mortality related to HCQ ranged from 2% to 20%. In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ≈3000 deaths) or underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ≈30000 deaths).
Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality was the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates.”
The smoke and mirrors theme persists throughout the paper, with the authors proclaiming, “The main finding of the present study is that HCQ might have been associated with an excess of 16990 deaths during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the six countries for which data were available.” It “might have been.” OK. Remarkably, they swiftly declared their study had a considerable list of limitations, noting that some of the results should be taken cautiously, particularly those obtained in France, Turkey, and Belgium, where “data concerning HCQ was scarce.” In a study limited to six countries, they admit half have non-existent data for their research. Go figure. And for the record, these types of skewed studies are everywhere attempting to steer the false narrative, as noted in the following tweet.
When the study is created for a certain conclusion you get the results you want to get in the first place…
“A U.S. government-sponsored study published late last month in The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal reported that most young children hospitalized for acute COVID-19… pic.twitter.com/dKkP4ycPfg
— Dr. Kat Lindley (@KLVeritas) January 10, 2024
