(New York Post) Google and Meta are spearheading a fierce push to kill New York legislation aimed at protecting children online — and the controversial lobbying battle is poised to surpass $1 million in spending, The Post has learned.
A group of Big Tech firms, advocacy groups and companies from other sectors have spent $823,235 lobbying Albany lawmakers through mid-March as two high-profile bills – the Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act and the New York Child Data Protection Act – advance toward votes, according to recent public disclosures.
“This is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills,” said one longtime Albany insider who requested anonymity to discuss the lobbying push.
The SAFE Act would crack down on addictive recommendation algorithms used by social media apps by requiring them to provide default chronological feeds for users 18 or younger unless they receive parental consent. It would also allow parents to impose time limits on social media use and in-app notifications.
The Child Data Protection Act would block apps from collecting or selling the personal or location data from users under 18 unless they consent. Kids under 13 would need a parent’s consent.
The disclosure forms show each firms’ total spending on legislation on the agenda in New York – including the online safety bills – and do not reveal their stances on specific bills.
The true scope of Big Tech’s spending to derail the legislation is difficult, if not impossible to pin down – but it is expected to surpass the $1 million mark when the next round of disclosures surfaces next month, sources said.
“This could be considered ‘historic’ in the sense that the bills are relatively low impact for the state compared with other issues that get a lot of lobbyist attention,” said Danny Weiss, a Capitol Hill veteran and chief advocacy officer at Common Sense Media, which supports the bills.
The cannabis industry spent millions of dollars over a period of several years in a bid to get marijuana legalized in New York. In 2022, a group of landlords and their advocates reportedly spent $1.4 million to lobby against passage of new protections for tenants.
“They are spending a lot of money to oppose these bills, as if they pose an existential threat to New York,” Weiss said of the blitz from Big Tech.
Both bills were endorsed last fall by Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul as well as State Attorney General Letitia James. During a January press conference, Hochul described social media as “a silent killer of our children’s generation.”
The two bills are expected to move through committee in the state assembly as soon as this week, which would be followed by a floor vote. The state senate is also expected to vote on the bills in the near future.
More than 25 other groups, including Mothers Against Media Addiction and the New York State United Teachers Union, have also expressed support for the bills.
Tech firms have hit back, citing fears that the legislation would stifle freedom of speech, online privacy for teens, limit internet access for migrants and other underserved communities, and essentially disable algorithms that help to crack down on hate speech.State Sen. Andrew Gounardes, who co-sponsors the bills, said opponents have funded an aggressive “whisper campaign” in Albany to delay or defeat the legislation.
“It certainly makes the job a lot harder, because these companies, with limitless resources, are able to hire armies of lobbyists who just camp out in the capital all day,” Gounardes said. “Legislators come and go and these folks are whispering in everyone’s ear.”
Facebook and Instagram parent Meta – which already faces a massive federal lawsuit over allegations that it has profited even as its apps fuel a teen mental health crisis – spent the most on lobbying related to the tech bills and other items on the state agenda, the disclosures showed.
A Meta spokesperson said the company supports federal legislation that would require app stores to get parents’ approval when kids under 16 download apps, rather than a state-by-state solution.
