(Gateway Pundit) Hundreds of thousands of Brazilians continued to protest their stolen presidential elections while celebrating Brazil’s triumphant start in the World Cup, beating Serbia 2-0. Meanwhile, President Bolsonaro and leftist Judge Alexandre de Moraes met with various arms of the Military in what could be the run-up to a military confrontation or coup.
Richarlison scored one of the most sensational soccer goals ever, with a kung-fu spin kick, sending the ball past Serbian defender Milos Veljkovic in the 73rd minute. Soccer-loving Brazil went nuts. Despite the all-important match, the protests in the streets of Brazil continued to swell.
In Qatar, Brazilian fans chanted “Lula ladrão, seu lugar é na prisão” ( “Lula, you Thief, you belong in jail!”), criticizing socialist Presidential candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who was convicted of money laundering and embezzlement and sentenced to nine and a half years in prison in 2017 before the left-wing Supreme Court released him in 2019 and nullified the sentence in 2021.
Foi lindo o estádio no Qatar 🇶🇦 Lembraram de você @LulaOficial LULA LADRÃO SEU LUGAR É NA PRISÃO 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🇧🇷 pic.twitter.com/GpUhZlkxNW
— Ana Paula (@AnaPaula15S) November 25, 2022
The Liberal Party (PL) allied with President Bolsonaro announced it will appeal corrupt Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ decision to deny the party’s request to annul votes from 279,000 corrupted electronic voting machines, and to fine Bolsonaro’s coalition 22.9 million Reals (US$ 4.28 million), for “bad faith litigation”. According to the party, this reaction from the leftist pro-Lula Judge was expected. Potentially, the PL could appeal to Military Court, exacerbating the confromtation between the pro-Lula Supreme Court and the proi-Bolsonaro military.
The corrupt Judge Alexandre de Moraes met with commanders of the Military Police on Wednesday, Nov. 23rd, in Brasília, in a move criticized by Brazilian Vice-President Hamilton Mourão, who called it the “apex of authoritarianism.” Mourão stated there was a “justified controversy due to the issue of the reliability of electronic voting machines and the blunt and exacerbated actions of the Superior Electoral Court.”
