Kari Lake Lawsuit: Arizona Supreme Court Orders Lower Court To Reconsider Ruling Over Ballot Signature Issues

The Republican candidate for governor, who was defeated by Democrat Katie Hobbs in November, had six of her seven claims rejected in her election dispute, but the court ruled that Lake may make a case regarding her seventh claim and that all parties must submit additional written arguments by March 28

Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake speaks during a get out the vote campaign rally on November 5 in Scottsdale, Arizona. - Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

(LifeSite) Arizona Republican Kari Lake is declaring victory after the state’s Supreme Court rejected six of her seven latest claims in the dispute over her unsuccessful 2022 gubernatorial bid by focusing on the court’s ruling that she deserves a chance to make a case supporting her seventh claim, which regards ballot signature verification.

In last November’s midterm elections, Democrat Katie Hobbs defeated Lake for the governorship of Arizona by 17,117 votes, 50.3 percent to 49.6 percent. Lake, who has defined herself as closely aligned with former President Donald Trump, contends that Hobbs won through vote fraud, and for months has insisted she will overturn the election and ultimately be installed as the true governor of the Grand Canyon State.


Last month, the Arizona Court of Appeals rejected Lake’s lawsuit, which argues that irregularities such as defective ballot printers, “deep flaws in the signature verification process,” and allegedly broken chain of custody for ballots in Maricopa County necessitate tossing the November results and redoing the election in that jurisdiction.

“Lake’s arguments highlight Election Day difficulties, but her request for relief fails because the evidence presented to the superior court ultimately supports the court’s conclusion that voters were able to cast their ballots, that votes were counted correctly, and that no other basis justifies setting aside the election results,” the court ruled.

It also upheld Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson’s earlier ruling that her challenge was improper under the laches doctrine, which forbids challenges to election procedures that are not brought until after an election has been held.

However, on Wednesday, the state’s highest court ruled that the appellate court erred in dismissing Lake’s count concerning the signature verification process, The Arizona Republic reported.

“Contrary to the ruling of the trial court and the Court of Appeals opinion, this signature verification challenge is to the application of the policies, not to the policies themselves,” the court ruled. “Therefore, it was erroneous to dismiss this claim under the doctrine of laches because Lake could not have brought this challenge before the election.”

The court also ruled against her other six counts in the suit, but the ruling directs Thompson to reconsider Lake’s signature claims on the merits, giving the candidate an opportunity to make her case that Maricopa County violated state law on the matter. Lake is currently focusing on that element of the ruling as a positive development.


Read More

Leave a Reply


Surprise Package? Transgender Traveler Says TSA Agent ‘Punched’ Her Male Genitalia While Going Through Security At JFK Airport In New York

Female Swimmer Riley Gaines Slams Woke ESPN For Promoting Biological Male Trans Swimmer Lia Thomas In Celebration Of ‘Women’s History Month’